Skip to main content

Is it okay to be 'Branded'? How good is it?

     With the human knowledge reaching the greatest heights with technology and connections, people basically know everything that is going around. (Or atleast have the means to know the world) Such knowledge brings about behavioral changes that in turn reflect on the choices of the people. The trends, the so-called 'viral' subjects and their intrusion into the human beliefs have given a new-age definition to the stereotypes.
     With so many influences crowding around the human mind, its goes for the best ways of de-crowding by following the stereotypes, but sub-consciously. This has created or more clearly defined the demarcations of various user groups. 'Certain products' are specific to 'certain groups' since the past years because that is how marketing or any other comprehension  works. But how does this specification come into picture? Is it from the depth of personal choice or from the surface of common beliefs.
     The common everyday recurrences of such ideas can be understood from the clothing choices of the people. The thought of preferring the 'branded creations' have gone beyond the consideration of quality and beauty. Majority of such preferences are merely due to the 'name' of the brand. Though it is a credit to the rich legacy of the classic brands, it also has a non-appreciable impact on the society. A more severe impact happens when the actual beauty of fabrication and craftsmanship is overlooked with the 'brand preferences'. With the worst case scenario coming, people have been 'judged' by their preferences. This breaks the equality vision amongst the population and every eye becomes capable of mental bullying.
     Being an immature kid, I once happened to ask my mother why we had to wear same boring uniforms to the schools. She inculcated the baby steps of social understanding in my nascent mind with a simple reply "Every child must get to look EQUAL". The sensitivity of the a child's mind doesn't get any better with age. Every human mind is sensitive and must have an unaffected  freedom of choice to appreciate the beauty and workmanship in any creation.
     Every creation has a nature of its own, a special feature of its own. Some say "Less is more" while others say "Less is bore". Thus, the branding must not go to the extent of affecting the actual unique beliefs of a human being. Originality must be left unaltered.
     Amidst the blind social drive, the strength of numbers in framing the stereotype, one must appreciate every texture in the fabrics, every tint and shade in the color palette, every degree of linearity in the profile of an object, every volume and density of the 3dimensional figures, every size of the visual display, every organisation or disorganisation of the numbers and every individual perception of the entire picture.
Branding must pave its way in parallel with the appreciation of the carefully created creations without intruding the perception of the peculiar.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Chennai's first immersive experience: The Real Van Gogh as a Photoessay

Immersive art opens up a whole new dimension. Being to the Van Gogh immersive experience made me actualize this in real time, with the life-size visuals of Vincent van Gogh's masterpieces. The brush strokes of his post-impressionist style and the signature Prussian Blue (Bleu de Prusse) of his palette left me spellbound, bringing me more closer to art than ever. The way his earlier works captured the emotions of the people he drew and the way he personified such emotions into art in his later ones, certainly stirred me, as an onlooker. I'm extending that feeling--that experience to you through this photoessay: The Van Gogh world nestled in the middle of a happening place in the city.  My lens capturing twelve sunflowers in the frame ( "and nothing else" ) to reminisce the 1888 painting by the name.  The tale of "The man who painted sunflowers" The impressionist brush strokes never missi...

Big Blue Teddy

Teddy bears are universally loved. They can instantly bring a smile on the onlooker. History takes us back to the time when American President Theodore Roosevelt refused to shoot a bear on a hunting trip. That being illustrated by a cartoonist was the very first profile of the teddy bear. The round fuller looking figure illustration sparked the impression. A candy shop owner with his wife, inspired by the illustration, developed the stuffed toy that became known as Teddy’s bear. Even today, the soft curved profile with the smooth fur surface and fluffy volume leaves an impression on our hearts. Being the fluffy companion it can, share your space, make you feel the company, see you through your emotions, listen to you and hug you to sleep after all the chaos of the day gets over. As the psychological facts have it, “ A 20 second hug releases oxytocin hormone, that lowers blood pressure and builds trust, happiness and love”. This explains the affinity of the female po...

Do we need to redefine our heritage?

Intangible heritage & Speaking heritage as a way forward (An entry for RTF Essay Competition 2020) www.rethinkingthefuture.com Image source Heritage structures go beyond the architectural or artistic features cloaking the value of their connection with the people in the context. The visual values outweighing the psychological values in a heritage structure, amidst being the first impression of every onlooker, stay in a secondary range of impact. The primary range of impact revolves around the “soul” or “spirit” of the structure that are often more than bricks and stones. Intangible herita ge that draws its definition from the stories that trace back the temple history , songs about the beauty of the practice and every other living reminder of the past-present link, tend to bind with the people and ‘live’ with them as beliefs and practices that influence their “ way of life” . These beliefs are of complete religious inheritance that has been conformed to, across ages, without...